• ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    37 minutes ago

    That verifying email for everything shit is something else all together. And yes it is true. Like what the fuck man? I am glad my fridge and stove and microwaves are all low-end crap that do the one basic job they are required to do (and they do it very well mind you).

  • BlackPenguins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 minutes ago

    I purposely bought the Typhur Thermometer probe for Christmas because it has its own base. It can connect to an app, but you don’t need one.

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Flying cars was a scifi delusion that didn’t consider all the problems that come with it. What would be a more rational “this was predicted and never came about” would be social constructs like safety nets and betterment of society for all, as well as improving our management and use of the Earth. That should make us mad, not that we don’t have flying cars buzzing (and falling) in the sky.

    It just hit me that we did for flying what we should have done for ground. Make it almost all mass transit.

    • PunnyName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Yeah, screw flying cars and parts falling off them due to disrepair.

      The real sci-fi future is trains. Numerous and fast.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Flying cars was a scifi delusion that didn’t consider all the problems that come with it.

      Same with living in space. Especially on space boats.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 minutes ago

        Maybe. We never got far enough to really test the waters that much. I think that it’s more possible than flying cars or living on Mars, but it would take huge effort, and my opinion is the window of opportunity is all but shut now. But why should we? If for no other reason than because of the “eggs in one basket” metaphor. Even past climate change and impacts, this Sun won’t last forever, and if we don’t find ways to move on, all life that we know of is gone.

        Maybe that doesn’t matter in the end, after all the universe also ends some way too. I think even if life is everywhere, it’s all unique, and so are we, good and bad. But we obviously don’t treasure what we have much, and maybe it’s better we don’t spread the same bad we do to Earth and ourselves elsewhere. It’s possible we simply advanced before we were mature enough to understand what we could stand to lose.

  • early_riser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    We really need to make people more aware of how their data gets from A to B. I think most people think you need internet access for anything connected to a network to communicate. If more people realized that if device A is on your LAN and device B is on your LAN, there’s no reason traffic from A to B has to traverse the internet, they wouldn’t fall for stuff like this.

      • zikzak025@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Some electric toothbrushes have these gimmicky features where they can map your mouth while you brush and report on your hygiene habits to tell you how effectively you’re brushing, or even nag you if you don’t brush enough. Guessing that’s the kind they have.

        So for the manufacturer, why allow the device to simply use a local account to track that information, when instead they can force you to register an account online and associate your brushing habits with all of the other shadowy telemetry data being collected about us online?

        • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 hours ago

          But also, these aren’t hidden features. That info should be on the box. I’m not trying to defend companies demanding your email and an account to use an electric toothbrush, but also at a certain point you gotta look at the consumer and say, you bought that. Electric toothbrushes aren’t exactly a monopoly out there; you can buy one that doesn’t require an email.

          • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            4 hours ago

            It’s pretty easy to put something on the box like this can make your phone buzz if you forget to brush your teeth, and people who worry they’re sometimes forgetting to brush your teeth will see that as an advantage without necessarily realising that they need to give the manufacturer their email and the right to associate it with their brushing telemetry.

  • MisterD@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    FYI: Kardia Mobile wants you to create an account just to use the damn thing.

    Will not use it

  • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 hours ago

    and the best is when the servers the use to send verification emails are crazy slow so you make a throwaway email (because fuck giving them your email, also handy to track who sells it and who they sell it to), go through their bullshit registration, then nothing. You checked spam even. You think you fucked up, and click resend email, still nothing. You give up and you can’t really use your new thing. Maybe you return it, if you’re smart. Then the next day you finally get the email, which indicates they clearly care about the user experience since they put so many resources into onboarding

    • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Flying cars costs 10 times as much as a regular car, and are not that great at flying or driving. You need driving and pilot license. Needs to take off from an airport or request special permission. It’s just not as practical and cheap as portrayed.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’m happy with those broadly staying science fiction. People already can’t drive in two dimensions. It’s worrying to think how awful it’ll be if they’re ever given a third.

      • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 hours ago

        There are a far fewer pedestrians and walls and lamp posts and motorcycles in the air than on the ground, though, so there’s a lot more margin to be awful without endangering anyone other than your own family.

        • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Well, a car falling from the sky (car crash or ran out of gas) probably wouldn’t be very safe either. I’m absolutely not trusting the average nitwit who pays more attention to Instagram than to the road to operate something akin to a mini-plane.

        • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Yes, but there are still pedestrians and walls and lampposts and motorcycles on the ground. I would imagine accidents would be far more disastrous and dangerous than in 2D.

          ~Add in people in convertibles who aren’t wearing safety restraints (or a failure of said restraints) if/when the vehicle does a 180° flip (for any reason).~

          • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 minutes ago

            Add in people in convertibles who aren’t wearing safety restraints (or a failure of said restraints) if/when the vehicle does a 180° flip (for any reason).

    • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      TBF, flying cars in most sci-fi rely on some kind of crazy convenient anti-gravity tech that allows vehicles to hover while still somehow retaining lateral friction so they don’t drift sideways when turning.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        A lot of space sci-fi spaceships have basically flown as if they are in an atmosphere, with a more-or-less aerodynamic shape and turning as if there are control surfaces in an atmosphere making them move more-or-less in the direction that the spacecraft is heading.