• silverneedle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    23 minutes ago

    Spotify’s functions have not changed a bit since 2016. It is literally the same application, what has changed are the tiny things they’re doing for compatibility but that is not really worth mentioning. Intentionally leaving UX out.

    Honestly what code is there to write for this glorified web browser? They’re probably also outsourcing most of their data collection and recommendation algorithms.

    Buy physical media, rip CDs, share shit and that’s it

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Is that supposed to be impressive? Spotify is among the dumbest, shittiest apps. It’s literally just a music library player.

    Spotify doesn’t exist because it’s some genius app. It exists because of legal control. They have no reason to make the app better. Indeed their shitty capitalist motives continue to enshittify the app.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rent-seeking

  • FreddiesLantern@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    42 minutes ago

    Reads as: we here at Spotify are a bunch of naive and gullible halfwits who have diluted themselves into being proud of it.

    thumbs up the suspenders, belly proudly hanging over the belt and gently rolling the feet from heel to toe

  • darthinvidious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    My first thought for the title is thinking it’s because they fired their best/most expensive developer and kept the AI baby sitters.

  • banshee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Why would anyone think this is a good thing? You’re actively telling the world that your product is likely full of bugs and hard to maintain.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      53 minutes ago

      Or even to true believers, they can just vibe code up just as good of an app.

      It basically declares point blank that the technology does not matter, it’s their marketing and music rights only that matter.

  • atfergs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This sounds like such a fucking nightmare. I got into software because I like writing code. Their job is now the equivalent of a full time PR reviewer.

    • BaroqueW@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      PR reviewer but the dev was drunk, sometimes is a genius, sometimes is eating sand, doesn’t follow guidelines, likes to duplicate code, and forgets what was in the original task description after a while.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        51 minutes ago

        And even if you babysit it and carefully tell it all the mistakes, it will learn nothing and suggest the same stupid mistakes next tim. I did actually know a human just like AI and he kept his job for years before quitting to grift another company because management refused to believe he sucked. So I’m not optimistic about AI screwing up discouraging business leaders.

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Do you know what we call someone that doesn’t write a single line of code?

    Anything other than a “developer”.

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      A manager. This tool is for what managers think software development is: managing the production of code. From that perspective this hype makes a lot of sense, just turn all your current developers into managers with AI and you now have grown the team by 10x. You can go back in time and find many jokes about how adding more developers doesn’t speed up delivery but slows it down. I don’t see how AI would suddenly make that less true, especially since the AI is not accountable for its results, you are.

    • ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Lmao, exactly. If you’re not writing the code you’re not the developer, the AI is the developer. Youre just another asshole who gets paid to do nothing.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      This is spotify. It’s just a music player. The overwhelming bulk of the code was probably written like 20 years ago by a 15 year old.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      47 minutes ago

      Look at the feature list bragged about. It’s really simple stuff. I can absolutely believe they vibe coded that stuff.

      The “hardest” one was to feed listener history to an LLM and have it generate a playlist based on the titles. That’s such an absurdly trivial thing to do.

      It’s not rocket science. It’s a trivial streaming music player.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Spotify is a subscription radio station. I’m sure their development team is large and doing great secret, next-level things. /s

  • coherent_domain@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I haven’t worked in the industry before, but I have always assumed the “best developer” reviews code and architects the project, thus they write a minimal amount of code pre-AI anyway…