• Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 minutes ago

    Awesome project! I would love to buy some robovacs, but I don’t want some unknown entitity mapping our home and whatnot. Our maid would love it too. Being done earlier for the same pay 😁

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I would actually be more interested in custom firmware for our old touch-and-go Roomba. The hardware is great, fully modular, did even survive a round of cat barf and washing. But the firmware is buggy and does inefficient vacuuming rounds.

    • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      3real5me…the amount of time and money needed to make even simple projects robust and truly usable, and not just a janky DIY job that needs to be used in just the right way or it’s wonky is always more than you expect. No matter how many times you’ve been through the process.

      • Eheran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I think my device is easy and intuitive to use. The user wants video instructions and refuses to use my thing otherwise :(

  • queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    If I have an old Roomba can I hack a new brain into it? I’ve got a Raspberry Pi and a soldering iron and a willingness to break them for science. Never done much hardware hacking though.

  • prenatal_confusion@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The game changer in robot vacs for me was the emptying station. My first one didn’t have it and it just sat in the corner. Full.

    • inari@piefed.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Doesn’t that lock you in to a specific type of bag that only the robot manufacturer creates?

      • prenatal_confusion@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It does but I am still on my first ten pack so …

        Also there are for sure some alternative bags, I just didn’t put time in to find them.

  • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’m surprised they didn’t go for more of a wide-mouth D bot design like the old neatos did. And a pi5 is hardly affordable in 2026. If it’s local only, does it really need the processing power of a pi? It’ll be on a home network with something running homeassistant anyway. Give it a dumb controller and make it like a wireless klipper bot, the heavy lifting done on the server.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 minutes ago

      Looks pretty cool but a very short list of compatible devices. Also, what they consider “budget options” are not what I would consider “in my price range”. LoL 😂

    • adeoxymus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I love valetudo!

      But I also think there should be more open source robotics, and a robot vacuum feels the right topic as a starting point.

      I think I also saw someone that wanted to make a robot grass cutter.

    • TDCN@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      As i understand it Valetudo is not actually firmware to control the robot. It is a “parasite” that makes the existing robot firmware belive it is connected to the cloud which is very different from actually controlling and navigating the robot. However, in terms of homeasistant integration it could be worth getting inspired.

      For a control operating system ROS could be something to consider. When I used it 10 years ago the project was quite unstable since tools changed constantly and it was overly complicated to work with, but a lot of development has happened since so maybe worth considering. I wrote this before reading the article

    • This is why I love foss software. Their is some guy hacking away at some very specific problem in his own time and he shares it with the world for free. You will have never heard of this problem or even contemplated its existence but once u know some foss developer has solved it going back to a world where it doesn’t exist is just a little bit duller.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 hours ago

    oomwoo?

    Sorry, I need to look this up on Squeam.

    Hey, on Mreesh, somebody said its a scam!

    … But then LikkiiLiikkii says its legit.

    Hrm, I wonder what Gronk thinks…

    • CTDummy@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      8 hours ago

      About the name: “oomwoo” is a rotational ambigram — it reads the same flipped 180°, just like the robot itself roaming your floor in every direction.

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    with a name like that, I really hope that it has a boot-up sound option where it makes an awoo boot noise.

  • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’ve been interested in Kärcher since it’s German and has better privacy laws than the US branded stuff. But this would be interesting. The Kärcher though is on sale for $400USD on their site, tough to beat. 🤕

    • Siegbaert@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Might also take a look at the ones from Bosch. I got the Spotless Max (without cam) and am pretty happy with it. But I also got no comparison to competitors how they perform.