• NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Its true there is a fan in the base of all bladeless fans, but the fan is smaller then traditional fan designs and moves the same if not more air then traditional fans.

    Air is pulled in through the base and forced through a thin slit. This fast stream of air creates an area of low pressure, drawing in and amplifying surrounding air behind the slits.

    Because air “sticks” to itself, when you get some air moving (by breathing out, for example), the initial bit of air that you move “drags” some air with it from beside and behind. This is what Dyson calls “air multiplier technology”.

    Dyson uses this property of air to claim that they only have to move a fraction of air (with the fan in the base) of all the air that blows past you.

    Here is a example of how this works, and how you can use one breath to fill a large bag.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAAelB7nN14

    Here is a image of the multiplier effect, from the original intake of air at the bottom. You can see the air is multiplied from behind and infront of the fan.

    1000063718

    • ToxicWaste@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      6 hours ago

      still a miss-labeling to call them bladeless fans, just because the blades are hidden. by that logic my beef raviolis are vegetarian (tbf: the catholic church made a similar claim during the medieval ages).

      Bernoulli Fan is not only more accurate, it also sounds much cooler.

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        5 hours ago

        To play devil’s advocate, there are no exposed blades at the point of use. I’d wager people who buy “bladeless” fans are more concerned with aesthetics and avoiding a crying toddler than they are with semantic accuracy. We call Wi-Fi “wireless” even though the router is plugged in.

        • ToxicWaste@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          at work we have expensive fans with a cheap metal mesh around them - to avoid a crying co-worker. at home i have a cheap tower fan with a weird plastic mesh - there are no visible blades on it except if i crank my neck into a really uncomfortable position and shine a flashlight into it. which one of the two can i call bladeless?

          luckily i already have a devils advocate and @arctanthrope@lemmy.world dropped the name of god. how well do i need to hide my fans blade to create a Ventilationbescheißerle?

      • arctanthrope@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        5 hours ago

        there’s a type of German meat dumplings called Herrgottsbescheißerle, which literally means “little things that bullshit the Lord” for the same reason

      • CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Well, Beef comes from cows, and cows only eat vegetation, so beef raviolis are vegetarian. Now, I’m not a Rocket Biologist, but I think the math here is pretty conclusive.

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        (tbf: the catholic church made a similar claim during the medieval ages).

        Carpinchos (capybara) are fish.

      • ToiletFlushShowerScream@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        You know … Bernoulli Fan - that’s way better idea than a room full of MBAs from expensive business schools and months of market research and focus groups with 2 way mirrors ever came up with. Well done

    • hOrni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      A traditional fan also pulls air from around its blades using the same principal. A bladeless is just a gimmick it has no actual benefits.

      Here’s a video on the subject:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySSo5PmZZJM

      It turns out, a bladeless fan is even less efficient than a traditional one. It works better, when you remove the casing.

      • turtlesareneat@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Thank you.

        Much like Sharper Image’s Ionic Breeze, this is a very expensive bullshit tower, but I am seeing them everywhere lately. Box fans are fucking amazing. Get a box fan.

      • Axolotl@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        it has no actual benefits.

        • no toddler will put their hands in to it
        • can look better for some people
        • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Toddler hands don’t go through the protection of a classic fan, if it’s built like after 1965.

          Also we were not discussing esthetics but efficiency.

    • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Smaller fans = more noise

      And why isn’t a regular fan getting the “surrounding air” to move too? Is there a subscription for that?

      It’s most probably dyson bullshit (the moved extra air is slowing the original air down, or it’s magic) marketing.

      Magnets!

    • vogi@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      unironically love Lemmy for the explainers you get on a shitpost. Only stumbled on this cause I was looking it up myself. Thanks for the write up :)

          • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Just like their hoovers then.

            Used to have to use one and I just don’t understand the bagless appeal. I like having a bag to contain all this awful dust. Felt like I needed to wash every time I emptied it and they fill up so fast in comparison too.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s the same reason I use a beef bouillon cube in place of real meat when I feed my vegan friends. It’s much smaller so it doesn’t count.

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Fans are usually loud in proportion to their speed. Quiet ceiling fans have a big diameter and many blades. Doesn’t a small fan cause a lot of noise?

      • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Honestly depends on speed, quality of bearings and motor, blade geometry and thickness as well as any possible enclosures.

        The biggest source of noise with fans is air cavitation.

    • expatriado@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      i don’t think the point of the post is about being useless or inefficient, but about the misleading name