• esc@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    34 minutes ago

    A little stability and consistency in the world, manjaro always delivers when it comes to this.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    We’re gonna sse the year of the linux desktop long before we see the year of default ACME lmao

  • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The funniest thing about this is that it needs a single Bash script and a cronjob to solve (unless they got a REALLY bad hoster).

    That bash script probably exists a bazillion times already… so even an LLM could spit it out for them.

    Their organisational structure must be abhorrent for nobody to feel even remotely responsible for this.

    • loutr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      56 minutes ago

      Most web server have ACME support built-in nowadays, setup is a matter of minutes, no scripting required. This has been a solved problem for years, any sysadmin who can’t handle this basic task has no business running public-facing servers.

  • Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Like, when you… “get” the certificate… Doesn’t it say… “on it” exactly which date it expires? So maybe set a thing in your calendar or an alarm on your phone or some shit? How hard can this be?

    • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 hours ago

      LetsEncrypt also gives you a month to update certificate, you don’t even have to do it yourself, just run a script once a week in cron. That’s such a level of incompetence I wonder why anyone will trust them with a distro when they can’t even do such a simple task.

      • TerHu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        yes, but the people who want to implement that are held back and sabotaged by the guy who owns the shit. this is not about incompetence.

  • daggermoon@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I thought the devs were supposed to be taking back the project. I’m guessing that didn’t happen.

    • Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      It was a whole forum thing and deadline before they would fork it - have not kept up with any updates personally

  • VonReposti@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Seems fine for me now. In fact it looks like they switched to Let’s Encrypt for certification so maybe they learned something from last time.

    • muhyb@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Well, Manjaro popped up when a lot of people cannot install Arch on their own. Same thing with Ubuntu and Debian. Once a userbase formed, people follow suit I guess.

      • octobob@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        I mean they have their own repos and take a position of “hardened updates” that are two weeks older than the bleeding edge ones of Arch. I used it briefly out of curiosity a couple years ago. It seemed generally fine, although I seem to remember having issues with some AUR stuff. That’s kinda to be expected and could even just be general fuckery on the part of the package maintainers, not manjaro. It could also be on manjaro’s fault lol.

        I’ve just stuck to Arch since then. Garuda and endeavour OS are both cool but I don’t feel like I’m gaining much by using either. And Garuda includes a bunch of packages that I don’t even want.

        I’m more interested in what manjaro can do in the mobile phone sphere. If they can build something viable yet fun to tinker with in the next few years that has a rolling release schedule, it could make for a cool Linux phone. Ubuntu touch is probably the more stable choice tbh, but that’s the beauty of Linux.

        • muhyb@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          It was a selling point for Manjaro at some point but people really shouldn’t use AUR with it. That’s just an invitation to a disaster. I think Manjaro is stable if you don’t mix it with AUR. Used it for 6 years and the worst I remember was their Nvidia cataclysm, mostly it was fine.

          Not sure if I would want to use cutting edge on mobile though. I tried PostmarketOS and Ubuntu Touch a couple years ago and Ubuntu Touch was actually daily drivable-ish. Really loved SXMO too, it’s a way different mobile experience.

    • Frank Exchange of Views@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Honestly, I installed it on my 2nd laptop and workstation because I really wanted the AUR, but got tired of Arch unstable update process 15 years ago and left Linux for personal use for MacOS. It still has everything I want on my main laptop, home brew and a terminal with tmux.

      It just works and I just couldn’t be arsed reinstalling, but yeah, if I would, I would just use Arch again now.

    • crater2150@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Are you sure? The screenshot shows a certificate expiring yesterday at 8:50 CDT, which is 23 Aug 13:50 GMT, and their current certificate has a validity “Not Before Mon, 24 Aug 2026 01:18:47 GMT”, so there’s a gap of around 11 hours.