• melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I no longer trust reported numbers now that the “system” has been grossly manipulated by cheats and scoundrels in power. I still smirk and shake my head at and teslars driving past me on the street though.

    • db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I no longer trust reported numbers now that the “system” has been grossly manipulated by cheats and scoundrels in power

      🌏🧑‍🚀🔫🧑‍🚀

  • TBi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Didn’t you read the headline? It’s in FREEFALL. It’s been SLAMMMED.

    /s

  • Peereboominc@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Don’t be fooled by the headline. Look at the long term trend. It is still high. Just a bump. Its the same price as July 2025.

    • alphabethunter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      But capitalism operates under infinite growth assumptions, and perpetually seeks increases in value. Any dip, regardless of how much it actually affects the company’s ability to operate and generate a profit, is a problem that spells doom for capitalists.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Note that while that sounds ridiculous, we demarcate value using a currency system that makes standing still look like mild growth. When you ultimately are controlling currency, you can create the appearance of growth under any real world condition you like.

        So a company that looks flat in a system designed to make flat look like grown is actually experiencing some decline.

        Of course whether that is a decline in product, results, or just random investor sentiment is all up in the air.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The company missed Wall Street expectations, despite its core automotive segment generating just over $20 billion in revenue, up 23 percent from a year ago.

    How the fuck did it make $20 billion? How the fuck did it make 23% more than last year? Who the fuck is still buying this shit?

    • Quazatron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 hours ago

      When I see people drive them, I wonder why you would buy such a thing.

      After a few years on this country’s hole filled roads and stone paved streets, they start to break down and develop a distinct squeaking noise, indicating that the build quality is not good at all.

      Still, I think it’s more of a fashion statement from vain people that will trade it for a new car in 4 years, so build quality does not matter. It says “Look, peasants, I have an imported american car. Envy me, you Peugeot driving scum.”

      • TBi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I read the front suspension has a design flaw and needs the rubber parts replaced often to stop the squeak.

    • kalleboo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      As always, people have short memories, or just do not give a shit about ethics

      https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/26/business/tesla-elon-musk-europe.html

      Tesla’s vehicle sales rose 77 percent from January through May compared with a year earlier, the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association said this week. In May, Tesla sold 22,000 cars in Europe. That’s more than Ford, Nissan or Honda, even when including their fossil-fuel models.

      Many people seem to have put aside their personal feelings about Mr. Musk after Tesla cut prices for its entry-level models to levels that are competitive with comparable gasoline or diesel vehicles and inexpensive cars from China. In some countries, Tesla’s Model Y sport utility vehicles can be leased for less than 300 euros, or about $340, a month.

      “Once you go down the pricing scale, people pay less attention to ethics or morality,” said Matthias Schmidt, an independent analyst in Berlin who tracks electric vehicles sales. “Tesla’s product has become so appealing from a price perspective, it’s almost too good to refuse.”

      • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        I remember Tesla sales dropping after this

        so I hoped people are still capable of using ethics when making financial decisions but it looks like I was wrong.

      • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        The people I know who bought one don’t give a shit about ethics. They stayed away from them for as long as they were socially unacceptable, but as soon as the storm blew over they saw their chance to buy one.

        Just… a data point. My experience is that at least 20% of a population doesn’t care about stuff like this. They care about their own social status, but not ethics.

        • 0tan0d@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Targeting 20 percent of the population isn’t the type of business model that puts your stock this far above all the established automakers though. The correction on the junk stock can’t come soon enough.

    • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 hours ago

      However, the company’s gross profits dropped as operating expenses climbed far quicker than revenue, in large part thanks to AI-related capital expenses and other research and development

    • gnutrino@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      5 hours ago

      By having your CEO come out as a fascist, pissing off the demographic that tends to buy EVs and also stagnating while allowing your competitors to catch up.

    • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Teslas are objectively last Gen. The only reason they still sell well in the US and some other markets is tariffs.

      • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Other US companies are actually competing with them for market share now, too. It certainly isn’t helping Tesla sell.

        Also, Teslas are starting to get the reputation they deserve: overpriced shitbox vehicles that have horrible build quality because Musk has stripped anything good out of them for profit.

    • Kabe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      In the US, the market has soured on EVs and the federal tax credits have gone away.

      Outside the US, China is eating their lunch.

  • eicker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Wall Street spent years pricing Tesla like a future AI empire instead of a car company. Now investors are getting a reminder that robotaxis, humanoids and promises don’t magically pay today’s bills. Reality has an annoying habit of showing up right after earnings season.

  • jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Maybe if Elon throws out a few more Nazi salutes, it will fix the problem. Surely that will increase sales.

    • andallthat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I mean, it would still make more sense than SpaceX + xAI. Unlike a data center, a Tesla did actually go to space

      • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        51 minutes ago

        And even that was out of spite. That was supposed to be the roadster that the actual founder of Tesla had ordered.

  • nialv7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    tesla has had disastrous earnings in the past and it hasn’t bothered the investors before. what charged?

    • geekwithsoul@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I think in the eyes of many investors, Elon has lost whatever mojo they thought he had. As Elon never had any mojo to speak of, this mostly just means the investors are finally catching up with reality.

    • gnutrino@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Could be that some of the irrational Musk fanboys have moved their money over to Spacex? Could also be a complete coincidence though given past Tesla price movements.

      • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Or, SpaceX dropping below IPO price woke up the braindead morons to reality and they’re now selling off anything attached to Musk.

        • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I’d say this is a significant factor. Some youtuber did a video where he basically showed that most Musk stocks were overinflated by a factor of 10 based on their traditional metrics. The difference was basically built on investors’ confidence that Musk could keep the companies growing. Between driving away customers, not focusing on building his businesses, and still not achieving the goals he promised, investors are rightly worried that desired growth is no longer something to bank on. He may have to stop relying on the wunderkind factor and actually start running his companies responsibly, and I don’t think he can do that anymore, if he ever could.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            58 minutes ago

            Didn’t help that he pissed away the carefully cultivated “Tony Stark” image. Now people don’t shrug off his failures like they were inclined to do.

  • roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Headline conveniently phrased to attract clicks from certain segment of internet users.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Futurism’s are particularly egregious. It exists to get clicks, and I mean in a way that clearly none of its writers give a single shit.

        This headline and story in particular are okay enough, but in general, Futurism will take scraps and turn it into “[x person/business/industry our readerbase doesn’t like] is literally shitting its pants and DYING”.

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I think people are tired of these headlines because we’ve seen the same thing for many companies, without lasting consequences. It’s even worse for elon musk related stocks, because of how much manipulation those ones go through.

        I don’t have a source, so take it with a grain of salt, but I vaguely remember a discussion that one of his companies couldn’t remove him because the stock was artificially inflated by his presence. It might have been tesla

        • RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 hours ago

          There is another problem which keeps stocks like Tesla afloat when it really should have tanked a long time ago: Index funds based on indexes like S&P 500 etc., where investors are automatically buying Tesla stock when buying into the fund, which stabilizes the stock in question. Musk knows this and that was the exact reason why he tried to get indexes to bend the rules of inclusion for spaceX to be included in indexes earlier than usual. The grave consequences are people investing in index funds are directly milked. Pension funds often include indexes, so what Musk is doing there is in effect trying to steal from people who did not actively invest in SpaceX.

    • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’ll admit it made me slightly giddy for a few seconds.

      I needed those seconds though, so I’ll take em.