This is so true tho

  • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    1 day ago

    They are real people

    XZ Utils (maintained single-handedly by Lasse Collin) is widely regarded as the most critical infrastructure library run by one person. Its near-catastrophic compromise in 2024 revealed how global digital security hinges on solo, thanklessly managed open-source projects. Other major examples include cURL (Daniel Stenberg) and SQLite (D. Richard Hipp)

  • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is why when Steve Jobs died in 2011 another far more important figure died… Dennis Ritchie. The man who made the C programming language and Unix, without which nothing Apple produced would be possible.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Not to downplay dmr’s importance here because he quite literally is the father of modern computing, but without him we’d just have something else and perhaps it would’ve been a bit later. A different systems programming language and a different operating system everything else is modeled after. High-level programming languages weren’t a new concept when he wrote C. Before B they already had Fortran. Funny to call any of those High-level in 2026, but that’s the whole importance of C, isn’t it? It made writing complex systems easy compared to assembly languages or even fortran.

      I’m not gonna bother doing a writeup about Jobs, we all here know he made precisely Jack shit.

      • username123@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Not necessarily against what you said, but I realized you can kinda say that about anything, with some abstraction. There’s always smart people (thankfully), and they’ll often arrive at the same solutions. Roll over, Gauss.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Well I think it’s different for scientific discoveries where something is either found or not. Software and other products… There are niche things that may never exist without the author, and there are generic things that would be created in one form or another anyway. Once programming languages were a thing, general purpose high level languages were bound to happen IMO and there are infinite possible languages.

          • username123@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Sure, but what I’m saying is that at a high level of abstraction scientific discoveries are similarly inevitable as well. I don’t think niche creations are a major difference since as you yourself stated “without him we’d just have something else and perhaps it would’ve been a bit later.”. The majority build on previous findings, often many scientists are working towards the same goals, and truth is truth, whether it be found through physical experimentation or fleshing out applied logic.

      • Ricaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yeah, Apple would just steal literally every single idea and piece of software from someone else

      • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Apple used Pascal up until the System 7 era anyway, C was just one of many choices of the time.

        If we didn’t have C, we’d probably have eliminated things like buffer overflows and out of bounds memory accesses decades ago.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Oh wow I didn’t realize Pascal was even older than C, thought it showed up in like mid-70s or early 80s. To be fair I’ve ever only interacted with Delphi, not OG Pascal.

          While I don’t necessarily like C, I am happy for C-style syntax over Pascal-style, which I’ve also worked with. Give me braces over begin and end any day of the week.

  • FedX@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    293
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ronald is indescribably more important than any tech billionaire could ever hope to be. So let’s raise a glass and give out a hardy thank you to all the Ronalds of the world!

      • pelya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        87
        ·
        1 day ago

        Written in hand-optimized assembly with individual implementation for every CPU on the planet, with integer division function in 10000 lines of code impelented with XOR and bit-shifting which is somehow 0.3% faster than CPU built-in division operation.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          55
          ·
          1 day ago

          He had to de-optimize the init sequence because the little trick he added that caused the init sequence to return a little power to the grid instead of taking it was causing grid stability issues because the returned power from offices starting up was a bit higher than the extra power required for factory startup weekday mornings.

        • palordrolap@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 day ago

          The mention of division has triggered a memory. I think I actually saw a library like that once. It was in C, not assembly, and was almost certainly for one specific architecture (probably Intel), but other than that, there was a lot of low-level stuff that claimed to make division faster for all CPU-native data types.

          It was above my skill level to just pick up and use, let alone read and understand, but I can tell you that it at least looked legit, and the author seemed earnest in their description, so something like your hypothetical is very much out there.

          • vrek@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            1 day ago

            There is a video where a real game dev was showing how bad a specific benchmark was. It was basically read arguments, get a random number, do a for loop 10,000 times, inside there do another for loop 10,000 times, do some equation with a modulo, put result in array, pick a number from array and print to screen.

            The biggest time cost was the modulo as that’s the hot path. He basically went through and typecast all the ints to double. He got 4x the speed. It went from almost 2 seconds to less than 0.5 second just on that change. This is mostly due to cpu and compiler now using simd instructions.

            Small changes can have big impacts.

            • palordrolap@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yeah, I’ve actually written quick and dirty code that used both a division and a modulus, but then went back later to use the former to calculate the latter with a multiplication and a subtraction to get a speed improvement.

              There have been other occasions where I’ve been able to replace something like average = sum / count; if average > y with if sum > count * y, when it’s not entirely obvious that y could be multiplied by anything and remain meaningful.

              But when a division can’t be avoided, you still want that genius-written magical library to take some of the sting out of it.

              • vrek@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                He didn’t do any of that. Just typecast the numbers to be doubles.

                The whole benchmark was a mess but that part specifically surprised me.

  • dracc@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not sure if it’s part of the joke but that word means “jerk” (as in “jerk off”) in Swedish.

    • antimidas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Most likely is. Many open source projects have a joke as a name, often containing some form of innuendo or a double meaning. Helps in maintaining the free nature of the tool (corporations don’t want anything to do with it) as well as lower expectations on professionalism. Plus it’s funny, especially if it’s an in-joke of a niche language.

      On the topic of “runk”, it’s also been loaned from Swedish to Finnish as runkata, or to runk = to jerk off. The actual act of it would be runkkaus or runkkaaminen. Can also be encountered in the form runkkari, aka a wanker (I’d assume Swedish had a matching equivalent). So the joke works in Finnish as well.

  • SalamiDommie@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 day ago

    The amount of businesses with things you just can’t touch for whatever reason is surprising.

    The reliance on something made that is barely understood by the entire company makes me think that society will drag on generations after any kind of societal collapse.

    • Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Or more things will happen like the Bhopal disaster where a chemical plant, over a decade or so, laid off or failed to replace everyone who knew what their carefully designed multi-layered safety systems did. When those systems aged and needed maintenance, the remaining production people took them out one by one. Then 500,000 people were gassed with cyanide. 2,200 immediate deaths. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhopal_disaster

    • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 day ago

      Social collapse isn’t an exciting day in your life, it’s a broad trend historians will puzzle over centuries later. Look at the bronze age collapse for an example.

    • LePoisson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      23 hours ago

      society will drag on generations after any kind of societal collapse.

      Reminds me of the Imperium in Warhammer 40k how a lot of the tech they use is barely understood or some of it is not understood at all. Like the adeptus mechanicus believe in the Omnissiah (me too) and a lot of what they do is purely ritualistic.

      But lots of those rituals are just stuff like turning something on in the right order. Or other mundane things that have become an arcane ritual after thousands of years that need doing for a thing to work right but nobody remembers why it needs to be done or how the thing works. Just that these are things you must do to please the machine spirits and make whatever random thing work right.

      Honestly there is enough complexity in enough tech nowadays that I’m sure almost all of us are doing something similar in many areas of our life. Like I would struggle to explain how the Internet works or even how my television actually creates an image on itself. Maybe a better example would be cars, a lot of people use them but don’t know anything about necessary maintenance or basic principles of how they work.

        • mcv@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Configure the right incantations and the machine god will serve your web pages, brother.